A New York police officer seeking to rename a Harlem street for a cop gunned down inside a Manhattan mosque 40 years ago was told by local leaders to seek the blessing of area Muslims.

NYPD Officer Philip Cardillo was shot dead in an infamous 1972 incident in which police responded to a fake “officer down” call from Muhammad Mosque No. 7, the New York headquarters for the Nation of Islam. The accused gunman was later acquitted, and the city’s perceived unwillingness to back the police has long been seen as a low point in relations between city government and the police department. After four decades, NYPD Inspector and local Precinct Commander Rodney Harrison wants a section of 123rd St. named after Cardillo.

“It’s been 40 years,” retired NYPD cop Randy Jurgensen, who was at the mosque when Cardillo was killed, told FoxNews.com. “It would be closure for the Cardillo family and the police officers there that day.”

In New York, the City Council typically approves street namings on the recommendation of local Community Boards. But members of Community Board 10, which represents the Harlem neighborhood of Manhattan, have effectively blocked Harrison’s plan by telling him to seek the approval of local Muslim leaders.

To say this is beyond disgusting would be putting it mildly!

H/T The Jawa Report

As of April 26, last month, Diana West posted an article counting 67 dead since November of 2009.

That’s 67 of our men and women (whether Americans or from our Allies) murdered by Afghani soldiers or police or military personnel supposed to be working with us on our side.

And I’m not sure this horrible tally includes that most egregious incident back in 2010 where a trusted Muslim confidante (a “Jordanian physician”!) had fooled a whole team of CIA operatives into letting him into a compound in Afghanistan without being sufficiently searched — and he exploded and took seven of our men and women down with him.

Now we see, yet again — “two British servicemen murdered by members of the Afghan national police force”. And, in that same story, we learn that these “green-on-blue” killings are escalating, now averaging one a week this year.

This brings the tally of Diana West’s “grim toll” at least up to 69 — although there may be good reason to believe this is a generously low figure (see Diana West’s article on this).

So what does the UK Defense Secretary Philip Hammond have to say about this?

He insisted that such attacks are “rare”.

“British forces work alongside Afghan forces every day with thousands of contacts with them every day,” he said.

“This is a country that has an insurgency going on in it and, sadly, occasionally, these events occur.”

Well, of course, not every Afghani on our side is undergoing Islamic combustion and shooting Infidels like a maniac. The rational question is not “are all Muslims doing this?” — usually meant as a dismissively rhetorical question in order to defend our continual naivety with regard to trusting Muslims — but rather should be, “How many Muslims are doing this, and is this number and rate simply too high for us to tolerate anymore?”

Secretary Hammond, like most in the West, has an irrationally high threshold set for tolerating outrageously deadly behaviors from Muslims.

And it’s literally killing us.

Perhaps these folks need a refresher on what the word ‘ally’ actually means, and our troops clearly need protection from these so-called allies which makes them, pretty much, not allies.

Let me be clear that I have the highest regard for our brave servicemen and mean them no disrespect by this post. In fact I hope I’m honoring them.

Seven-hour non-stop gang rape by 12 Afghan MUSLIM refugees was the ‘most gruesome rape marathon in Sweden’s history,’ say prosecutors. The rape was oral, anal, and vaginal, with up to three rapists in her at the same time. Only 7 of the 12 rapists were convicted.
The other Muslim onlookers were clapping and cheering and calling the woman a “whore” and a “slut,” how Muslim men describe unveiled women. The victim is now confined to a wheelchair, suffering severe mental distress. The Swedish media concealed the ethnicity of the perpetrators and quickly removed the story. Swedish socialists say it would be “racist” to deport the rapists. No wonder, Sweden is now considered the rape capital of the world.

But remember: this has nothing to do with religion or culture, nothing at all!

Because we live in a broadly patriarchal society, we should not be surprised that the culture which brought about the worldwide financial meltdown was overwhelmingly masculine. But consider also that the people who are most vocal in denying human responsibility for the disastrous effects of climate change are mostly male.

The people who control factories of wage slaves in the developing world are almost exclusively men, as are the commanders of terrorist regimes. Leaders who threaten or declare war are mostly men as are those involved in paedophile gangs.

I do understand that many of our upper crust did indeed bugger us, but they didn’t literally bugger children, unlike some Muslim peadophile rapists I could mention.

Ahem, here is the BBC’s Question Time folks making excuses for Muslim peadophile rapists…

The victirm blaming begins around the 11:00 mark. It is truly horrific and nasty. I cannot fathom why these turds weren’t dragged out of the studio and flogged within an inch of their lives. Understand that these monsters were forced upon the British people, and this is the real outcome of allowing these monsters into any Western nation.

According to very smart people who most likely won’t accidentally blow up the planet this girl, Florence Coleman, has ‘Britain’s most beautiful face.’ This is a serious claim and we will allow you, dear reader to verify this claim for yourselves…

And now, here is Saudi Arabia’s most beautiful face…

Choose wisely!

Others rule fivin…

A man a dog and his gun

A view from the beach

American power

Astute bloggers

Barking moonbat early warning system

Bring the heat bring the stupid

Camp of the saints

Classic liberal blog

Dustbury

El opinador compulsivo

Eye of Polyphemus

Feral Irishman

Fishersville Mike

Full metal patriot

Guns & Bikinis

Hell on earth

Hookers & Booze

Laughing Conservative

In a mad mad mad mad world

Knuckledraggin’ my life away

The last tradition

Pirate’s Cove

Pitsnipes gripes

Proof Positive

Randy’s Roundtable

Reaganite Republican

Soylent green

Mr. G’s blog

Daley Gator

The Hostages

The Rio Norte Line

Theo Spark

Three beers later

Woodsterman

As a psychologist in Copenhagen’s youth prison I had a unique chance to get insights into the culture and religion of Muslims and the causes for the violent behaviour and high crime rates among Muslim immigrants. My Muslim clients told me their stories from their families and communities, about life in their home countries, about their experiences with and views on non-Muslims and the Danish society. I had around 150 Muslim and 100 Danish clients on my couch. They all came from the same age group (12-17 years) and the two groups had on average the same social and economic background. Most of them were found guilty, but a large part also proved to be innocent. I thus had a very good opportunity to compare Muslims and non-Muslims psychologically.

The conclusion is that there are strong psychological differences between Muslims and non-Muslims. It is also clear that Muslim culture influences Muslims in a way that makes them more likely to become criminal and display anti-social behaviour – especially towards non-Muslims and non-Islamic authorities.

Police and social workers were last night accused of failing to investigate an Asian paedophile gang for fear of being perceived as racist, allowing them to prey on up to 50 young white girls.
The nine men from Rochdale were yesterday convicted of abusing five vulnerable teenagers after plying them with alcohol, food and small sums of money in return for sex.
However, the true number of victims, who were “passed around” by the gang, is likely to be nearer to 50, police have admitted.
Greater Manchester Police and the Crown Prosecution Service have now apologised after they failed to bring the case of the first victim — Girl A — to trial following her cry for help in August 2008. . . .
Complaints to social workers and the police were ignored because they were “petrified of being called racist”, former Labour MP for Keighley Ann Cryer said. . . .
“This is an absolute scandal. They were petrified of being called racist and so reverted to the default of political correctness,” she said.
“They had a greater fear of being perceived in that light than in dealing with the issues in front of them.”
Girl A told police that she had been raped and provided DNA evidence from her attacker, however the CPS twice decided not to prosecute him.
The 15 year-old’s abuse continued and at its height she was being driven to flats and houses to be raped by up to five men a night, four or five days a week. She was singled out because she was white, vulnerable and under-age.

And…

“This is an absolute scandal. They were petrified of being called racist and so reverted to the default of political correctness,” she said.

“They had a greater fear of being perceived in that light than in dealing with the issues in front of them.”

Girl A told police that she had been raped and provided DNA evidence from her attacker, however the CPS twice decided not to prosecute him.

The 15 year-old’s abuse continued and at its height she was being driven to flats and houses to be raped by up to five men a night, four or five days a week. She was singled out because she was white, vulnerable and under-age.

Her ordeal only ended when her teachers forced social workers to intervene after she fell pregnant and they became concerned by the number of Asian men picking her up from school….

Assistant Chief Constable Steve Heywood acknowledged that officers could have dealt with the case “better than we did”.

But he denied that the girl’s complaints had been “brushed under the carpet” because officers were reluctant to confront the issue of race.

“At the time we did what we thought was best,” he said. “We have learned a lot of lessons.

Stacy McCain asks: Suppose you had to choose between living in two societies: One in which police are racists, or one in which teenagers are gang-raped. Believe it or not, this isn’t entirely a hypothetical question in England.

Of course this is a BS formulation as it is not exactly “racism” to take note of child raping Muslim scum, is it? In fact the word “racism” here is being employed cynically in an attempt to stop decent people from noticing the heinous acts of the indecent.

The hard truth is that until we stop pretending that “racism” is any sort of problem in modern Western countries we won’t be able to address the actual problems confronting us like, say, child raping Muslim scum.

Just curious here, had Britain run short on child raping scum?

[Army Brig. Gen. Mark] Martins [the chief prosecutor] also defended women on his prosecution team who he said were dressed appropriately at the arraignment Saturday. He was responding to complaints from Cheryl Bormann, a Chicago defense attorney for Walid bin Attash who wore a long black abaya to court.

On Sunday, she said her client was offended by women who did not dress in conservative Islamic attire, feeling that it caused him to sin. “It is distracting to him to see a woman who has anything bare other than her face,” she said.

She added that she had met with her client a dozen times and always dressed respectfully. “He is that conservative,” she said.

Which in my mind just goes to show how silly the very notion of providing civilian trials to these snarling barbaric savages really truly is. Not to mention foolishly allowing them into civilized Western nations.

But beyond that this is not a question of ‘Conservatism,’ this is a question of cultural and religious revanchism. This may shock you but I am an honest to goodness Conservative, yet I am comfortable with women exposing their ankles.

On 1 May in Solingen, the German anti-Islam movement PRO NRW (Pro North Rhine Westphalia) held a demonstration. Hundreds of assorted Muslims and far-left extremists turned up to harass and intimidate them. Two of these “antifascists” found themselves in the midst of a horde of Salafist Muslims, who promptly started beating them up with bits of wood. Even after they were lying helpless and passive on the ground, the Muslims kept laying into them. One was badly hurt in the head; the other in the arm. Both required hospital treatment.

Apparently it wasn’t a failure of recognition either. The Muslims knew that these were leftist anti-fascists who had come to protest against the “islamophobes”. They beat them up anyway.

But sure Leftoids, I’m sure the Muslims will give you a pass because your just such amazing people as this story indicates, right?